WBA orders Golovkin vs Lara, re-orders Santa Cruz vs Wood

Fighting

Some fresh new rulings emerged from the decaying, excrement-caked stoma we call the WBA today. Up at 160, Gennadiy Golovkin has been ordered to face “world” champion Erislandy Lara within 120 days of his September clash with Canelo Alvarez if he intends to stay at middleweight. Down at 126, Leo Santa Cruz has 24 hours to accept a fight with Leigh Wood after the sanctioning body denied his request to unify with Rey Vargas.

Lara (29-3-3, 17 KO) technically should have gotten this opportunity a while back. He knocked out “Cornflake” LaManna for the belt in May of last year in what was, even by the WBA’s standards, an absolute joke of a matchup. Three months later, the WBA once again promised to reduce the number of titles in play after the Mykal Fox vs Gabriel Maestre debacle, only for Lara to apparently fall through the cracks.

It doesn’t really do anything for Golovkin (42-1-1, 37 KO) outside of being, if you’ll activate your Broadcaster Brain for a moment, a “legends fight.” To be fair, it could be a fun clash of elite-level technicians with a willingness to slug it out. It just seems more likely to me that if Golovkin loses to Canelo, he’ll spend his twilight year(s) chasing unification.

A sanctioning body quashing a bid for unification is usually a bad thing, but not so here. Santa Cruz (38-2-1, 19 KO), who hasn’t defended his title in 3.5 years, first got the order to meet “world” champ Wood (26-2, 16 KO) in April; there was reportedly a kerfuffle over the purse split, but Gilberto Mendoza claimed that would be resolved by the end of May. [CENSORED] or get off the pot.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Nyika steps in to face Opetaia on Jan. 8
Tyson Fury Says he hasn’t spoken to his wife “in three months ” while preparing for rematch with usyk
Video: David Benavidez and David Morrell scuffle at press event
Holiday Fight Night 3 — Nisa Rodriguez continues her road to the top on December 17
Boxing streaming and TV schedule for Dec. 17-21

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *